Vota Inteligente

Quick Look

Vota Inteligente aims to use technology provide Chilean citizens with more information about their elected officials.

Beginning Date: 
September 28, 2009
Project Scale: 
Types of Tools: 


FAIL (the browser should render some flash content, not this).


What problem is your project aiming to overcome?: 

There are several problems. More generally I would say that it has to do with democratic development, which can be further broken down into more specific tasks. One of those tasks is to provide greater accountability in a system which is lacking information. And so to provide information to citizens and NGOs who can hold politicians accountable. And, actually, much of this information is out there, somewhere. It’s in some PDF somewhere in the website of Congress. Or it is in some quote that some journalist took from some politician. What we did was organize all of that information that was out there and make it more accessible to citizens. So the first task was to fill that gap of information so that individual citizens or NGOs might exercise accountability.

But also I think that the issue of confidence in political institutions is very important. And confidence in politics. One of the main diseases of Latin America has to do with this increasing lack of confidence in the political system, and the increasing lack of confidence in democracy. So, for example, if you look at the data from last year’s Latino Barometer, nearly half of the Latin American population doesn’t care if they live in a democracy or not as long as their economic problems are solved. That’s a concern; that is a trap in the longterm. I think that one of the missions that the Smart Citizen Foundation - and also several other NGO’s - is to tackle the problem of the lack of confidence in political institutions. That confidence doesn’t just magically come from anywhere. You have to build that. And one way to build that confidence is to have more transparency within your political system so that people can know what exactly is going on, and so that they can distinguish between those who do their job and those who don’t. Then we would have the information when elections come about to vote for and support those who are responsive and transparent, those who attend Congress, those who actually legislate and are not corrupt. That is the idea.

Why did you personally become involved in this project?: 

The team shares a common story here. I had years of experience working in NGOs related to poverty reduction and I wanted to learn more about the policy side so I moved to work with the government in order to understand how policies are designed, created and implemented. I worked for the government for a time and then I moved to the London School of Economics in order to have more of a theoretical and technical approach to what policy means, and to compare the design and implementation of policies.

I began to study issues of transparency, and while I did that I began to learn about different experiences when it comes to policies related to transparency. I also learned about the work that different NGOs were doing in this field. Of course Transparency International is the first example to come to mind, but also you began to see that a lot of movement was happening in civil society around improving transparency as a mechanism to improve democracy as a whole. And I found that idea very compelling to both study and work toward.

Though I am doing a Ph.D. I am not just an academic in terms of someone wanting to live in academia and teach and write papers. I come from the NGO side. I come from the policy side. I come from where the action is being developed. So I couldn’t study a Ph.D. without doing something active at the same time. That was my case, but it was also the case of Rodrigo Mobarec and other people that together started the Smart Citizen Foundation. We basically realized that in Chile there was a gap in terms of transparency policies and a need for an NGO to provide information related to politics and to exercise accountability. And, definitely, the use of technology was the right way to do it.

In Chile we are absolutely geeks and fans of technology. Fourteen percent of Chileans have a Facebook account. I don’t know that statistics about Twitter, but it also must be quite a big percentage. So people are using technology and we wanted to take that opportunity and use technology to promote our agenda - the transparency agenda and the accountability agenda.

Are you providing unofficial channels of information that should be provided by the government?: 

We are providing additional channels. But it’s not the information doesn’t necessarily exist. That information- in terms of the accountability of Congress, for example - is out there. But sometimes to reach the records of a given committee you have to sometimes click eight or nine times and find a PDF where in the third paragraph of the 20th page you get some data that is particularly important. So what we do is get into that data and organize it in a very didactic way. We are creating new channels of existing information. We are cleaning up the information that is available. We don’t just give you the Excel sheets with all the data. We tell you, ‘look, there is some particularly relevant information for accountability in cell C-25’ so that you can make more informed decisions. We are organizing existing information for citizens.

How does the information published on your website turn into offline change?: 

That is the big question. Last year I had a conversation with a Chilean investigative journalist who published some of the main political scandals. Sometimes investigating these big political scandals takes months of research. You publish them and then you realize that two days later life continues as usual and the report didn’t make much of a difference.

Recently there was a big scandal in Chile of pharmacies coordinating on the prices of medications. It was a big scandal and everyone was complaining when it broke. But by the second day people just shopped again at the same stores and with the same companies that were part of the scandal.

I think that this is a big challenge for us in terms of what happens next. So if we get the data, and if we organize it, and if we build a good story with it, will citizens react to? Will it make a difference? Will it create a circle and then come back to Congress, and have an impact on elections? We still don’t have that problem solved. We just have the aim to do the job right and see what will happen. We will persevere with the goal that more transparency will lead to more accountability in the political system.

What is an example of how information on your website has led to a concrete change?: 

In Vota Inteligente we organized a transparency ranking of information that was published on the websites of the presidential candidates. We made a list of factors based on what items should be made available on their websites. Then we evaluated all of the websites of all of the candidates to see how much information they were publishing. We published the results, and they were all very bad. From zero to 100 the average for all the presidential candidates was between twenty and thirty percent. So we published this information and we worked with the media as well to show that there was a low level of information being made available by the presidential candidates in terms of policies, programs, participation, and also how much funding they are receiving and how they spend it.

We updated this ranking four times in total. And we saw an evolution from around 30% to nearly 80% regarding what information the presidential candidates made available. Since it was news they were concerned about providing more and more information through their websites. This was all fostered at first by the Vota Inteligente platform. As a result we got more information for citizens to use when deciding who they should vote for.

How many people work on your project?: 
How many hours a week do you personally spend on the project?: 


How many hours does the whole team spend on the project?: 


What are the most time consuming tasks?: 

Maintaining the databases. Web development can also be a problem, but if you have good web developers who work well with graphic designers than it’s not so bad. But in our case when we have poor databases in Congress and we need to digitize a lot of documents and make our own databases, well that takes a lot of time.

How do you extract value from large amounts of data? How do you build engagement around it?: 

It’s difficult. Not much of the information is available in digital format, in a sense that you can crawl and track the information. For much of this you have to look through PDF’s in a very tedious process. Actually, the Congress is a bit divergent in this case. So, the deputy’s chamber just uses PDFs, but the senate uses a digitized format that allows us to track what they publish.

We are looking forward to see what will happen in the future. Up until this point much of the focus on the website of Vota Inteligente has been on the presidential election. So you only have to track four candidates - and just two for this second round. But then when we track the senate it is going to be different. It’s still an issue and a challenge to come.

What has been the most effective method of spreading awareness about your project?: 

We mainly use Google Analytics as a way to see visits and to see where they come from. We also take a look at Facebook and Twitter in terms of followers, re-tweets, and so on. That information gives you an idea of the people you’re reaching. Many of the people that we want to reach are not online. So we also work with the media closely so that we can make the information we gather available so that it can be published in newspapers and seen on television so that people who don’t go online can use that information when it is time to vote. I think that is particularly important in Latin America because not that many people go online and we still have big gaps of inequality regarding who is online.

If you are really aiming to improve democracy and foster participation you have to, of course, take advantage of technology, but you cannot leave the mainstream media. You have to use those channels as well so that your information can be used by the majority of the people who don’t go online today.

What are the incentives to participate in your project?: 

I think that Vota Inteligente has fostered quite a bit of public participation, but also not as much as I would like. And I think it’s going to take more time. I distinguish different forms of participation on the website. One is to post information by leaving some comments and sending information through Twitter, Facebook and so on. In this part we have lots of people participating in Facebook and Twitter mainly. But, on the other hand, when it has to do with people exercising action through the applications that we have created, that’s a bit more difficult.

For example, there is an application called FixMyStreet that MySociety has and we adapted that to allow citizens to denounce wrongdoings in terms of publicity during political campaigns. So, for example, you wake up in your house and you realize that your wall has been painted by someone with the name of a particular candidate. Or if there are posters that are hanging on electricity poles that might be dangerous - which has been a problem over the last campaign - we created a program so that citizens can take a picture with their cell phone and report the issue through our website. That information is then posted on a map, and the application automatically sends an email to the municipality and to the candidate telling them, ‘look, this problem has been denounced, how do you respond?’ We had a whole tracking system that was very nice, but it wasn’t successful because we didn’t have enough people sending in this type of information.

I think that Chilean citizens today are incrementally getting used to technology as a mechanism to promote transparency, accountability, and social participation. Today it’s Twitter, it’s Facebook. Hopefully tomorrow it will be more interactive forms of participation through applications such as the ones that we created for this election.

Has there been any communication between your project and government officials?: 

Yes, definitely. We’ve had good communication. We approached those officials who were particularly keen about issues of transparency. First we approached those who promoted the Freedom of Information Act in Chile. Then we continued to approach those who had good ratings in Congress, such as those who regularly attended Congress and work hard in their committees and so on. Those people - and there are actually quite a few - are really interested in these types of projects. They are interested in distinguishing themselves from those who are not doing their job correctly. So we are in contact and they support us.

There are still some issues that we need to solve, however. For example the format of the information published by Congress.

Are there any legal obstacles to your work? Any laws that should be changed?: 

There are quite a few laws that should be changed. Chile has had quite an advance over the past two years, especially with the implementation of the Freedom of Information Act, which happened just in 2009. The problem is that the Freedom of Information Act - like in most countries around the world - doesn’t apply to Congress. So basically we cannot request information from Congress through the Freedom of Information law. So one thing that should be done is to reform the Freedom of Information law so that we can request information from Congress. That would be one thing to change. The second thing has to do with the funding and expenditures of political parties and the political campaign law. That is definitely something that we have to change. In Chile, currently, the law’s two main problems are first, at least 30% of the donations for political campaigns can be reserved so that the public doesn’t have access to who gave that amount of money. When you don’t have access to that you can’t identify interest groups and match interest groups with votes and policy to see how money has had an influence in the political sphere. The other thing is that the information that candidates provide in terms of campaign donations, is only given after the election takes place. Therefore, citizens cannot take that information into account when they make their voting decision.

Also in Chile we don’t have a lobby law. So we don’t have a record or registrar of the various actors of who are the players influencing the decisions of politicians, which gives you clues in terms of who and where to look for the influence of money in politics.

If someone gave you $100,000 how would you use the money?: 

Definitely to organize and digitize documents and information. Of course we need operational funds in terms of organizing and preparing people and building teams. Also, money is needed to prepare web developers to get into transparency and accountability issues. But most of the money has to be spent to gather, organize, and disseminate the information. The main problem isn’t a problem of secrecy of Latin American governments; the problem is that social actors cannot get the information because we don’t know where it is, or because it’s badly organized. So if we really want to improve transparency, if we want to exercise political accountability, and if want to use technology to do it, then we need databases.

So, first money to build the databases, and also some money to organize teams to use those databases.

What are your plans for 2010 and 2011?: 

Beginning in March we will have the Vota Inteligente website available for information about the Congress. Today what is online is focused on the presidential election. We have been working over the past few months on the Congressional version, but it will only launch in March and still needs a lot of work. So that will keep us busy for 2010. But also from mid-2010 we will begin to prepare implementations of Vota Inteligente for the presidential elections in Argentina and Peru, which will be in 2011. So those are the main challenges for next year - Congress from March onwards and then preparing the implementations for Argentina and Peru.


Towards a latin america project!

Congrats for global voice in creating a project to collect several e-governance experiences in Latin America and others regions. If I understood, this experience gather information and data about presidential and put into the website. A great movement into a good accountability of actions and politicies from governments, mainly, in this experience, for the national government.

Another step I observed is about the latin america. Is Latin America towards to construct a vota inteligente? Because if argentina, chile and peru are suposed in setuping this kind of experience, is a litlle step to build this in Colombia, Ecuador, Mexico, central america, Brazil, uruguay...

Congrats for accountability!

Organization, a key to information access

Vota Inteligente is a new strategy to face the problem of transparency, voting, and organizing information that is available, but not easily accessible, something that has been an issue all along Latin American history. It also deals with the now general hunger for reliable information that grows stronger all along the continent. The fact that researchers with experiences both in observation, presentation of data and direct work, makes this project a tool to ask new and more coherent questions, find new solutions, and present each informative element into different shapes that can be part of other projects devoted to the same kind of problems.

An advantage of this case is the high rate of technological literacy, which backs up a more active participation of the general public. Their key is organization of data to enhance its availability. Also, the use of 2.0 tools is as interesting as it is wider than in other cases seen in the region. Thus, a new eye on legislation and access to information is getting people together through the Web; and this, hopefully, will be one way to push forward the rapid development of the Chilean society towards technology and self-observation that took slow steps in the past.

Collaborating with mainstream media to ensure answerability

I agree with Laura that it seems that a key major advantage for Vota Inteligente compared to some of the other projects we've reviewed is that such a large percentage of Chileans are considerably tech-savvy. However, I think it is also interesting to look at when Vota Inteligente was successful in bringing about accountability and when it was not. The successful example is when a small team of researchers working for the organization published their review of the information made available on the candidates' websites. They then worked with mainstream media (notably Spanish-language CNN) to spread more awareness about their findings. The candidates then responded by making more information available on their websites in order to raise their position in Vota Inteligente's rankings. That's a great example of using online publishing and then working with mainstream media to demand a response and more specific information from candidates. But it was done by a relatively small group.

An example of where Vota Inteligente was not successful was in their use of an adaptation of FixMyStreet to encourage citizens to submit reports of illegal election-related banners and publicity. Rather than relying on the work of just a few researchers, they hoped to attract the contributions of regular citizens out in the streets. But they weren't able to attract those contributions. Is this because Chileans don't feel that illegal campaign publicity is a problem, or does it reveal something more general about the difficulty of crowdsourcing information? How could that initiative have been made more successful? Should Vota Inteligente have worked with mainstream media to more aggressively spread awareness about the initiative? Did they need to hold training workshops in communities where illegal publicity is common?

And are there any other examples that Vota Inteligente can point to where really broad civic participation led to specific accountability by public officials, institutions, or candidates?


It really is inspiring to learn that there are groups out there like yours. It is rare to find projects like this one that take on the responsibility of keeping their public officials accountable. Spreading the word and keeping your own records is the best way to contribute to the Chilean society, and your Twitter and Facebook analytics strategy seems to be the most effective way of keeping up with the online community that you are reaching. Keep up the good work.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <pre>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options